Thursday, 17 November 2011

Iran's Nukes Won't Change a Thing!

At every single public gathering that Prime Minister Benjamen Netanyahu has attended since he has become Prime Minister since he was elected he has spoken of the danger of Iranian nukes. We all heard him say it when he addressed the UN recently, even though that address concerned the Palestinian application for recognition of statehood. I heard him say it on the 10th anniversary of 9/11 and then it also sounded out of place, especially since, like at the UN he opened his speech talking about it.

This is in marked contrast to the complete silence that characterised Israeli discourse in the run up to Operation Orchard, the Israeli strike on the Syrian nuclear reactor in their desert. 

The reason for this is simple, Israel does not have the ability to destroy the Iranian nuclear capability, Israel cannot prevent Iran from getting the bomb. And guess what, it really doesn't matter!

The Iranians have 16 known nuclear facilities whereas all it took was one strike by less than 10 aircraft from the Israeli Air Force it would take a lot more to take out all of those facilities at once. Even if that strike were successful one still has to ask oneself for just how long Israel would have stopped the Iranians from having the bomb and put that up against the number of Ron Arad's that the Iranians had managed to get their hands on during the strike.

I am not going to turn this into a study of how any potential military strike on Iran would have to evolve, it is fair to say that it would require a massive number of Special Forces troops to direct the precision guided munitions as well as risking the lives of the helicopter crews that would have to take them in and pick them up and of course pretty much the entire Israeli Air Force that, hopefully, wouldn't get attacked by any states other than Iran while invading a neighbouring state's air space while delivering their payload. Then of course no one seems to have been able to explain how Israeli bombs are going to be able to bomb sites that are sitting underneath entire mountains.

Bibi knows just how infeasible an Israeli attack on Iran is, that's why he keeps exhorting the Americans to do it. Only have the air force and cruise missiles large enough and with powerful enough munitions to shut down the Iranian programme. But guess what, they aren't going to do it! And we are goign to have to get used to that fact.

The truth is we are already living under the threat of attack from Iranian Chemical and Biological weapons. They have various strains of anthrax and Mustard gas to name just 2 nasty things that can and have been weaponized for use against large civilian populations. Not only have the Iranians not fired them but neither have they distributed them to their proxies such as Hezbollah. For those of you arguing that they may have and that we just don't know I concerned that you are correct but that if they have they certainly haven't been used, to which I ask the question why not? If Iran having a nuke is bad because they would launch it against us then it stands to reason that they would launch any weapon capable of destroying the Israeli populace already.

The truth is that the Iranians want a nuke because a nuke is the thing to have! It's that simple.

Wednesday, 9 November 2011

King George Street

Every day I see this homeless woman, her turf is King George and Kikar Rabin, her bed a nearby bench






The place for Shwarma









This guy was shouting "Forbidden! Forbidden!


Great example of Apartheid Tel Aviv


Searching bags at the Dizengof Centre





The homeless mix with the chic by the mall









Dog walkers park



Having a cigarette waiting for customers


Best borekas in town












Sunday, 6 November 2011

70 Years of the Palmach



I wrote a feature celebrating 70 years of the Palmach for the Jewish Chronicle

Check it out HERE

Friday, 4 November 2011

16 Years Since it all went Wrong



It has been 16 years since the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin,

He showed a nation the way forward, perhaps he was ahead of his time, perhaps some people are backward.

We remember him and hope that his work will be completed






Wednesday, 2 November 2011

28 Days of Sobriety



Well it was an interesting experiment if nothing else.

What did I learn?

Well I learnt that it is in fact possible to go out and not drink. For the first 8 days of not drinking I didn't go out anywhere, I couldn't understand the attraction of leaving the flat for a bar if I couldn't drink. Having said that when I did go out I was funny and witty (are they the same thing?) and drinking nothing but water, which meant I wasn't worried the next day about whether people were laughing at me or with me.

It's much cheaper not drinking, that's for sure, having said that there's no getting away from the fact that going out is less fun without alcohol!

What was quite disturbing is that on my self imposed abstinence I noticed that every time I saw someone drinking beer on TV I wanted to drink as was the knowledge that before I stopped for 28 days I would have simply gone out and got one.

The lack of hangovers were most definitely something to be appreciated and I am sure that my liver is thanking me right now.

When I went back to drinking, as in the night that I decided to end this experiment I found that at first I didn't actually want a drink. Before I was totally just drinking as much as I could without really asking why? The other night I found myself ordering another beer and wondering why I was doing it. I have gotten so used to drinking as much as I possibly can that I never stopped to ask myself if I even wanted to.

So now I am back on the sauce and it's nice not to have to explain to people that I am doing a personal development thing that involves not having anything to drink when they ask why I am drinking my 17th Coke of the evening. It is also nice to have a couple of drinks when I go out, but for now and probably for ever the brakes are most definitely on when it comes to binge drinking.

Tuesday, 1 November 2011

Chasing Ilan Grapel


It was a simple email from a Ha'aretz journalist that got me started on my quest. It riled me up just enough to make me want to sink my teeth into the Ilan Grapel story if for no other reason than to show them up.

The email they sent me positively dripped with banality

"Hi Marc,

I am a reporter for Haaretz English Edition and I saw your blogpost about Ilan Grapel. You said you went out with friends of his - do yound helping me get in touch with them? Thanks so much in advance!"

Well yeah actually I do mind or to use your vernacular "yound", after going to all of the trouble to find out information now I have to watch as the mighty Haaretz swoop in and take the story from me? I think not, I decided to set off on a quest to find Ilan Grapel myself. If Haaretz were emailing me for help then I figured that I stood a better chance than them of finding out some more info to bring into the public domain.

My first port of call was to my cousin in London, she studied at the IDC in Herzliya with several people who had met him before he was incarcerated. She sent me to an American who had served in the Nahal at around the same time that Ilan had served in the Tzanhanim and they had met each other once or twice. He chose not to be named.

My phonecall to X lasted a good 10 minutes and he told me all about meeting Ilan after the army when Ilan spent a couple of days on his couch visiting.

He recalled how it was "very apparent from talking to him that he was a huge Arabist." X relates being pretty surpised at hearing how this former IDF Paratrooper told him stories about teaching people Hebrew in Egypt and talked about hanging around with guys from the Muslim Brotherhood. But when it came to the allegations that Ilan was a Mossad spy he simply said "no way man!" When I pressed him as to why not he went on to detail how "he had pictures of himself in his IDF uniform on his Facebook page for all to see. It was wide open, like you didn't even have to be his 'friend' to see them, you could just look him up."

He also insists that there is no way Ilan was guilty of trying "to foment Muslim-Christian tension and turn the people against the army in the days following the ousting of President Hosni Mubarak" as had been suggested by Egypt's State Prosecutor at the time of his arrest.

"There's no way he was a spy and there's no way he would have done anything violent, he's just a guy who loves to talk, loves to debate is all."

So the trail had begun to warm up, I had spoken to someone who had actually met the man and spoken with him at length about Israel/Palestine and the Middle East, now I needed to close in a degree of seperation. Before I could bring it up X said "you should speak to Y, he is like one of his best friends man, he was a big part of the campaign to bring him home."

Jackpot! I think to myself! "fantastic" I say, what's his number?" So the story moves to the United States as I close in on Ilan via his best friend.

After almost giving up I finally managed to get hold of Y who is living in the United States, unfortunately he doesn't want to be named either. So now I have to offer my sympthies to the guys in Haaretz. Being proper journalists there's not much chance of them being able to use unnamed sources in their stories and therefore they wouldn't be able to continue any further. However as a blogger, the insurgents of the journalism world, I am free to interview X and Y and let you decide whether or not they really exist or are simply a figment of my imagination.

So Y starts talking to me about how he has just flown back home after meeting up with Ilan in New York, actually after meeting him at the airport in what he described as "One of the most amazing, exciting times of his life." He relays to me titbits of information about Ilan's time in prison. "He was arrested at the youth hostel he was staying in, he was cuffed and hooded and led away." I asked Y about Ilan's treatment at the hands of the Egyptian police, Y informs me, as Ilan has already informed the world, that there was no physical torture. "They just kept going on at him in the interrogation that he was a Mossad spy and he just kept denying it. After a while they started accusing him of other things too, really bizarre things."

Now this is getting more interesting I think to myself and I ask "What kind of things?"

"Well, they accused him of being involved in a plot to smuggle weapons over from Libya with which he was gonna attack Christian targets in Egypt to foment unrest." Blimey, we are really going through the looking glass now!

"What did he say to that?" I ask slightly taken aback

"What could he say? He just kept in denying it and denying it until they began to understand that they had the wrong guy."

"Did he know where he was being held?"

"No dude he didn't know, but he did say that the Egyptians treated him with respect, that they never physically abused him or anything, in fact he was treated like a VIP prisoner."

"A VIP prisoner? What does that mean?"

"Well he was kept in solitary confinement for the whole of his incarceration, which actually was probably the best thing as the other prisoners are treated really badly and he was given the choice of three different things to eat everyday, including pizza."

"Hmm pizza, I still can't quite figure out why they arrested him, what was it that he was doing that led the Egyptians to him and to decide that he was a spy?"

"Listen Ilan was there at a fascinating time, there were a lot of changes going on, he is a guy who loves to adventure and loves to see things and maybe they arrested him just to distract from some of the things that were going on...There was also a picture taken of him holding a sign, it was like a tourist trap, you know you pay a couple of dollars and they take your picture"
That wasn't exactly an answer to my question but I don't push, it's not a question that even Ilan himself would necessarily be able to answer.

"Has his incarceration changed the way he views the world?" I am trying to subtly allude to his views of the Israel Palestine conflict... trying to be subtle.

"He hasn't changed in any way because of this and he still doesn't know who betrayed him, the thing is he has always been a Zionist, in fact the only time he missed his reserve duty was when he was being held by the Egyptians."

I thanked Y for his time and meekly asked him to reccommend the Jerusalem Post as the place to give his big interview. "I dunno man, he's getting calls from like CNN and all the big guys for an interview. They're taking it slowly and are going to be strategic in who they give access to. But I'll mention it to him"

Ah well I got pretty close, between X and Y a picture emerges of a man who believes in an Israel that stands a chance of being at peace with the world around it and who then went one further and tried to prove that Egyptians could like him in spite of his Israeli citizenship and army service.

In most of the articles that I have read about Ilan he has been portrayed as a naive guy who got himself caught up in something bigger than himself and essentially paid the price for his simple reading of the world. I am not so sure, I think that actually the Ilan Grapel story represents something much more tragic than that.

Here is a man who came to Israel, did his duty and took a bullet in the shoulder for his efforts. Undiscouraged he STILL believed in the inherent good in people and set out to prove it. He spent time in Cairo (more than once) meets nice, friendly people there and dispels the myth that all Arabs hate Jews, at least he dispels it to himself through his own interaction with Arabs. He makes friends, learns the language and has an all around good time only to have it crash down on his head.

Sure the cynics out there will turn around, wave an accusing finger and say "I told you so". Perhaps if there were more Ilan Grapels out there, willing to take risks we wouldn't all be stuck in this mess that we call the Israeli Arab conflict. He took a chance and it didn't work out for him in the end but at least he took the chance to get to know the 'other' how many of us can say the same?